Introduction to Professional Errors and Omissions

    Professional liability arises out of a failure to render professional services competently.  Negligence is decided if there is a failure to conform to the professional standard of practice (Natl Tele Coop Assn v. Exxon Mobil Corp, U.S. District of Columbia, 04/03/01) in the community.  The standard of practice is the subject of expert testimony unless either the professional violated the law or an ethical standard, or the conduct was such that any reasonable person could determine that it fell below standards.  

    PROFESSIONAL  A professional is any person who holds her or himself out as having special expertise in a field and provides a service in that field for compensation.  Most professionals have a license and have special education, but some have not. Those that have not might not be legally categorized as professionals (Chase Scientific Research v. NIA Group, NY Court of Appeals, 03/22/01).  

    PROFESSIONAL RELATIONSHIP  Professionals have fiduciary relationships with their clients or patients. The professional relationship is contractual so the duties to the client or patient arise from that contract.  A licensed professional may owe a duty to, not only the client, but also to the general public.  As an example, an architect has a duty to the client to design a functional building, but also to the general public to design a safe building.  Similarly, a physician would have a duty to the public to advise of a serious and highly contagious disease.  

    COVERAGE  Coverage is usually excluded by a general liability policy. Professional liability coverage for some professions is under an "occurrence" based policy, but for many others the only available coverage is under a "claims made" or "claims made and reported" form.  

    INVESTIGATION  The investigation of professional liability claims should include two important elements at the outset.  The insured professional should be personally interviewed and all relevant documents obtained.  Unless negligence is obvious, informal consultation with a peer professional is the next step.  

    Since a professional relationship is based on either an oral or written contract, the contracted scope of services is an important consideration.  If the contract is oral, the insured's initial communications with the client or patient need to be reconstructed.

    The insured's file or chart should be copied and carefully examined.  All contracts should also be copied.

    A client or patient may suffer harm without the harm being caused by a negligent professional. Accordingly, consultation with the insured and expert should focus on causation issues as well as negligence.

     

Click A Case
The time of discovery of a failure-to diagnose claim is when injury is found to be related to undiagnosed pre-exisitng condition.
McGraw v. United States of America
U.S. Ninth Circuit
February 25, 2002 MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY
In a legal malpractice suit defendant needs to make a prima facie case that a plaintiff's attorney is at fault and so should be disqualified.
In Re; Stone v. Satriana
Colorado Supreme Court
February 25, 2002 LEGAL
Even without direct or indirect contact a physician-patient relationship can be established.
Lownsbury v. Banburen
Ohio Supreme Court
February 20, 2002 MEDICAL
No wrongful life.
Kassama v. Magat
Maryland Supreme Court
February 5, 2002 MEDICAL
No recovery for emotional distress in legal malpractice case.
Long-Russell v. Hampe
Wyoming Supreme Court
February 4, 2002 LEGAL
Defending carrier is entitled to defense cost contribution from additional insured.
California Court of Appeals
January 9, 2002 MEDICAL
A defending carrier may be estopped from asserting a valid defense to coverage if the carrier unreasonably delays in disclaiming coverage and the insured suffers prejudice as a result of that delay.
U.S. Second Circuit -- New York law
January 10, 2002 LEGAL
The insurance seller's certificate of insurance added an additional insured but disclaimed the power to alter an underlying insurance policy. This In this claim for recovery of defense costs, Court agreeed with the district court that TIG and the additional insured failed to provide summary judgment evidence sufficient to support claims for estoppel, mutual mistake, fraudulent misrepresentation, or negligent misrepresentation necessary to reform the policy.
U.S. Fifth Circuit
January 9, 2002 BROKER
Long time to perform surgery does not necessary establish malpractice.
U. S. Ninth Circuit
January 3, 2002 MEDICAL
The information needed to be provided in an informed consent should generally be established by expert testimony.
North Dakota Supreme Court
January 3, 2002 MEDICAL
Surgeon has no duty for follow-up care when there is no post-surgery diagnosis of problems.
Connecticut Appellate Court
January 2, 2002 MEDICAL
Long time to perform surgery does not necessary establish malpractice.
U. S. Ninth Circuit
January 3, 2002 MEDICAL
The information needed to be provided in an informed consent should generally be established by expert testimony.
North Dakota Supreme Court
January 3, 2002 MEDICAL
Surgeon has no duty for follow-up care when there is no post-surgery diagnosis of problems.
Connecticut Appellate Court
January 2, 2002 MEDICAL
Defendant attorey brought action against doctors in "tooth-staining" tetracycline case, but not against manufacturer. This may have been malpractice.
New Jersey Appellate Division
December 27, 2001 LEGAL
Damages for phyiscal impairment and disfigurement are not subject to general damages medical malpractice statutory limitation.
Colorado Supreme Court
November 13, 2001 MEDICAL
A third party action by hospital against patient's parents for gross negligence in failing to obtain a liver transplant should be dismissed.
New Jersey Appellate Division
November 11, 2001 MEDICAL
Legal malpractice statute of limitations does not begin to until the underlying litigation is final is certified by Florida Supreme Court.
U. S. Eleventh Circuit -- Florida law
November 6, 2001 LEGAL
Therapist's sexual misconduct with patients not attributed to office at which therpist is an independent contractor.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
November 6, 2001 MEDICAL
Even assuming that the defendant accused of malpractice actually did coerce his client into accepting a settlement, where the eventual settlement exceeded what the client could likely have gotten at trial, there is no injury and therefore no tort.
U.S. Seventh Circuit
November 2, 2001 LEGAL PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY
Because Wisconsin requires the legislature to unambiguously demonstrate an intent to alter the common law standards for a negligence per se instruction to be appropriate, a law that generally ensures public safety is not necessarily a "safety statute."
U. S. Seventh Circuit -- Wisconsin Law
October 25, 2001 MEDICAL
A pathologist who many years later discovers an error in his negative diagnostic finding has no continuing duty to patient that would extend statute of limitations.
Connecticut Appellate Court
October 24, 2001 MEDICAL
Statute of limitations bars claim against health care provider for failure to warn patient of danger of driving, issue of duty to warn not decided.
Missouri Supreme Court
October 23, 2001 MEDICAL
Inserting a Penrose drain during surgery may or may not be malpractice but no post-operative removal clearly is.
Washington Supreme Court
October 18, 2001 MEDICAL
Legal malpractice case dismissed since client criminal defendant not exonerated on appeal
Tennessee Supreme Court
October 5, 2001 LEGAL PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY
A doctor's obligation to obtain a patient's informed consent to medical treatment includes "a duty of reasonable disclosure of the available choices with respect to proposed therapy and of the dangers inherently and potentially involved in each."As a matter of law, a treatment that cannot legally be administered in this state is not "available" within the meaning of this rule, and thus that a physician cannot be held liable for failing to disclose the existence of such a treatment.
California Court of Appeal
September 28, 2001 MEDICAL
A lesser standard of proof is required for establishing liability in the underlying case. The plaintiffs in this transactional legal malpractice action were not required to prove the opposing side in the contract negotiations would have given them a better deal than the contract terms affected by their attorney's negligence, had the negligence not occurred.
California Court of Appeal
September 28, 2001 LEGAL
For arbitration: in a wrongful death action against a nursing home, it is necessary to establish validity of the contract.
Florida Supreme Court
September 28, 2001 NURSING HOME
There is no coverage for a bank under their directors and officers policy when it provides that insurer would indemnify the officers and directors of the bank for any loss that they were obligated to pay, or for which bank was required to indemnify them, and thus the policy did not provide coverage for the bank itself in the action by a borrower or obligate the insurer to defend the bank.
Illinois Appeals Court
August 30, 2001 DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS/ COVERAGE
The seven year statute of repose for medical malpractice claims by minors is constitutional.
Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
September 5, 2001 MEDICAL/PROCEDURE
Statute of limitations begins to run when there is a final judgment in the underlying litigation.
Florida Supreme Court
August 30, 2001 LEGAL
The statute of limitations begins to run from the time the patient learns that his injury could have been avoided, so doctors' assurances that amputations were unavoidable is not sufficient to make him aware of the cause of his injury.
U.S. Third Circuit
August 29, 2001 MEDICAL
When an attorney has a basis to believe he has breached a professional duty, he has a reason to foresee that his conduct might be the basis of a professional liability claim against him, notwithstanding a subjective belief that the claim is time barred or lacks merit.
U.S. Third Circuit
August 29, 2001 LEGAL/COVERAGE
A radiology provider owed a continuing duty to patient for care when X-rays of the same part of the body were read three times.
Missouri Supreme Court
August 24, 2001 MEDICAL
Medi-Cal has lien on recovery in medical malpractice "wrongful life" case.
California Court of Appeal
August 16, 2001 MEDICAL
If there is a risk of injury or disease, parents cannot consent to child's participation in research that is not therapeutic.
Maryland Court of Appeals
August 16, 2001 MEDICAL
Where a professional liability insurance policy specifies coverage in terms of a stated dollar amount plus "claim expenses", prejudgment interest that accrues while the insurer decides to defend, rather than negotiate and pay, is an expense, not indemnity, payment.
U.S.Tenth Circuit -- Oklahoma law
August 10, 2001 COVERAGE
Even though plaintiff's out-of-state expert consulted with local medical experts to familiarize himself with local standards of medical care, his affidavit should have been considered in response to defense motion for summary judgment.
Idaho Supreme Court
August 7, 2001 MEDICAL
An accountant has indemnity claim against an attorney who represented the same client.
California Court of Appeal
July 25, 2001 ACCOUNTING and LEGAL
An action for insurance agent negligence does not accrue until related litigation including coverage litigation is over.
Florida Supreme Court
July 20, 2001 INSURANCE BROKER
Physicians on the hospital's peer review committee enjoy a qualifed immunity for their service and decisions.
Pennsylvania Supreme Court
July 19, 2001 MEDICAL
"Reasonable certainty" rather than "probability" is the proper jury instruction in this medical negligence case.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
July 11, 2001 MEDICAL/PROCEDURE
By statute members of a peer review committee of a medical care facility who act in good faith and without malice are immune from liability.
Kansas Court of Appeals
July 6, 2001 MEDICAL
Agent accepted and deposited payments for new policy of life insurance on infant.  However, all questions on application were not completed and insurer had not yet issued policy when baby died.  Court discusses elements of "temporary insurance" and concludes that no policy was issued as application was incomplete and insurer had not, itself, yet received premiums at time of death.
Idaho Supreme Court
July 6, 2001 INSURANCE BROKER
In Wiley v. County of San Diego (1998) 19 Cal.4th 532, this court held that when a former criminal defendant sues his or her attorney for legal malpractice, the former client’s actual innocence of the underlying criminal charges is a necessary element of the malpractice cause of action. The Court granted review in this matter to address a distinct, but related, question and finds than a former criminal defendant must obtain exoneration by post-conviction relief as a prerequisite to obtaining relief for legal malpractice.
California Supreme Court
July 2, 2001 LEGAL
The standard of care for judging the conduct of blood centers and related groups is the ordinary, reasonable care standard, not the custom-based standard of conduct the trial court used in this case.
New Jersey Appllate Division
July 2, 2001 MEDICAL
The trial court should not have allowed the testimony of plaintiff's neurologist that she suffered from an internal derangement of the left knee and detachment of the medial meniscus. Such testimony was based on an arthrogram report prepared by a non-testifying doctor that was not addressed to the neurologist, and should not have been admitted into evidence since it constituted an expression of opinion on the crucial issues of the existence and severity of plaintiff's injuries and formed the principal basis for the neurologist's opinion on those issues, "not merely a link in the chain of data upon which that witness relied."
New York Court of Appeals
June 26, 2001 MEDICAL
Co-counsel do not owe each other a fiduciary duty, only a duty of loyalty to the clients. They have not entered into a joint venture falling under the Uniform Partnership Act.
California Court of Appeals, First Dist., Div. Three
June 26, 2001 LEGAL
Simply a psychotherapist's failure to cure an eating disorder or depression, or even the destruction of a marriage, does not constitutes an injury on which a claim of professional malpractice unless there was guarantee of successful treatment.
Utah Supreme Court
June 22, 2001 MEDICAL
Parents have standing to sue relating to their claims for personal injuries to their adult daughter resulting from her treatment by various therapists and a hospital. Claims against the therapists for implanting false memories of sexual and physical abuse in their child are not necessarily to be dismissed based on public policy concerns of confidentiality in the therapist-patient relationship. Also, a breach of contract claim against the hospital can be pursued as well despite public policy concerns.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
June 19, 2001 MEDICAL
A surgeon is not vicariously liablle for the negligence of a hospital nurse.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
June 13, 2001 MEDICAL
The issue decided is whether a client has a claim for legal malpractice when that client signed a revised settlement agreement without reading it, relying on its attorney’s misstatement that the stipulation was changed to correct only one typographical error.  The Court concluded that the client may have a claim.
New York Court of Appeals
June 5, 2001 LEGAL
More Recent             Earlier Cases
Advertising Injury Construction
Defect
Personal Injury Premises
Liability
Aviation
Product Liaiblity Professional Liability Auto Liability Transport Liablility Maritime
Auto Bonds Liability Property Work Comp
Quick Find Research Local Index Go | Send
About Us Feedback Terms and Conditions Our Privacy Policy
Link To Us Advertise Contact Us
Copyright 2000 ClaimRep.com, Inc.