Personal Injury

Basics Investigation Coverage Local Law    

Answer as many questions as possible. Then click "Analyze Coverage" button.

 

 

 

Does any offense arise out of the conduct of, or on behalf of, the named insured? Yes No ?

 

Did the offenses and damages occur exclusively outside the policy territory?

  Image

 

Did the offending acts begin after the end of coverage?

   Image

 

Did the offending acts end before the coverage began?

   Image

 

Is there libel or slander of a the claimant as a person or organization?

  Yes No ?

 

Is there disparagement of the claimant's products, goods or services?

   Image

 

Was there a first publication of disparaging material prior to the beginning of coverage?

  Image

 

Did the insured allegedly know the publication was false or was there a willful violation of the law?

  Image

 

Is a violation of privacy involved or alleged?

   Image

 

Was the offense connected to any advertising activities of the insured? Image

 

Is false arrest, detention, imprisonment, or malicious prosecution involved or alleged?

   Image

 

Is wrongful eviction from a home, or wrongful entry into a home involved or alleged?

   Image

 

Was the eviction on behalf of the owner, landlord or lessor?

   Image

 

Is there a claim for injunctive relief or restitution?

   Image

 

Is there a claim for monetary damages?

   Image

 

Do the damages include a loss of profit that the insured earned instead of the claimant?

   Image

 

Is environmental pollution claimed?

   Image

 

Is there a claim for interference with a prospective business advantage?

  Image

 

Was the conduct of the insured allegedly intentional?

  Image

 

Is there a claim for punitive or treble damages, or for statutorily imposed costs?

   Image

 

Did the insured assume liability?

   Image

 

Would the insured have had legal liability without a contractual assumption of liability?

   Image

 
Yes, offense arises from conduct of named insured. Do not know if conduct by named insured. Connection between offense and insured's advertising. No independent connection with insured's advertising. Indeterminate connection with advertising. Yes, there is a defamation claim. There is no claim of defamation. Not certain if defamation is claimed. Yes, libel or slander of product/services is involved. No libel, trade libel, slander or disparagement. Unknown if disparagement involved Yes, first publication was prior to policy term. First publication may not have been before coverage. Date of first publication is not known or not relevant. Yes, claimant in postion to be damaged by offense. No, claimant could not have been damaged by offense. Indeterminate whether claimant could be damaged. Yes, quality or price was misrepresented. No, misrepresentation of product/service not involved. Unknown if quality or price misreprepresented. Yes, damages incurred wholly outside policy territory. No, damages were wholly within policy territory. Damages may have been in and out of policy territory. Yes, advertising began after policy ended. No, advertising did not begin after policy ended. Unknown when advertising began. Yes, advertising ended before policy began. No, advertising might not have end before policy began. Unknown when advertising ended. Yes, injunctive or other non-monetary relief is sought. No non-monetary damages are sought. Nature of damages sought is not yet determined. Yes, monetary damages are sought. No monetary damages sought. Damages sought are not yet determined. Yes, the claim does involve environmental pollution. No claim involving pollution. Unknown if pollution is involved. Yes, claim for interference with a prospective business advantage. No intereference with prospective business advantage claimed. Unknown if interference with prospective business advantage is claimed. Yes, advertising injury arises out of a breach of an expressed contract. No breach of expressed contract involved. Unknown if there was a breach of an expressed contract. Yes, the insured may have known published material was false or there may have been a willful violation of the law. No knowledge of falsity or violation of the law. Indeterminate whether knowledge of falsity or willful violation of the law. Yes, intentional acts are alleged. No intentional acts alleged. The issue of intentional acts is indeterminate. Yes, exemplary, punitive or treble damages are sought. Or attorneys fees are sought based on intentional acts. No exemplary damgages. Unknown if any damages are exemplary. Yes, the insured assumed damages under a contract. No, the insured did not indemnify. Indeterminate whether the insured indemnified another party. Yes, insured would have liability outside of any indemnification. No, but for the assumption of liabiity, the insured would not have been liable. It is uncertain whether the insured would have been liable in any case. Yes, there is an antitrust allegation. No antitrust allegation. Indeterminate whether antitrust may be involved. Yes, invasion of privacy is alleged. No, invasion of privacy is not alleged. Indeterminate whether invasion of privacy is involved. Yes, false arrest, detention, imprisonment, or malicious prosecution is alleged. No, false arrest, detention, imprisonment or malicious prosecution alleged. Inderminate whether these offenses are involved. Yes, wrongful eviction or wrongful entry alleged. No wrongful eviction or entry involved. Indeterminate whether wrongful entry or eviction is involved. Yes, eviction was on behalf of owner. No, eviction was for benefit of the insured. Uncertain, for whose benefit eviction was. Yes, eviction was on behalf of owner. No, eviction was for benefit of the insured. Uncertain, for whose benefit eviction was.
About Us Feedback Terms and Conditions Our Privacy Policy
Link To Us Advertise Contact Us
Copyright 2000 ClaimRep.com, Inc.